Pentru a avea putea naviga in Sex Shop trebuie sa aveti peste 18 ani! (continut pentru adulti)

Pagina principala » Produse » Lenjerie sexy

Site map

Lenjerie sexy - Netzkleid Rosu S-L

Cod:

8214086

Pret:

89.90 RON

899000 ROL

Categorie:

Lenjerie sexy

Rochie din plasa care se muleaza usor urmarind contururile trupului. Cele trei bretele de sustinere pot fi aranjate in diferite moduri, astfel incat se poate obtine de fiecare data alt model al rochiei si bineinteles o alta atitudine.

Marime: S/L.

Culoare: rosu. Material: 85% polyamida, 15 % elastan.

   Puteti face comanda si la telefon 0741931924 sau ID messenger: besterotic (de luni pana vineri intre orele 9-20, sambata 9-14) si nonstop pe e-mail comenzi@besterotic.ro
   Comanda va fi procesata in maxim 24 de ore si ajunge in 3 zile lucratoare la Oficiul Postal de care apartineti.
   Pentru comenzile mai mici de 100 RON, cheltuielile de transport vor fi suportate de client, pentru comenzile mai mari de 100 RON, cheltuielile de transport sunt suportate de firma noastra.

Cheltuielile de transport sunt de 9 RON.

Comentarii pentru Netzkleid Rosu S-L:

1 comentariu:

KyOzznUzgUZQQSArHM:

Bento, I would have an evolution-denying Ron Paul berfoe any of the other Republican candidates. And as a Spinozist he is still without equal, I am afraid. Just a lot more doctrinaire than you or I would be. What in particular do you object to (pretend you never noticed his evolution remarks) with Dr Paul? How exactly is he similar to Ross Perot and is that bad?Mike B is simply not running, so forget about it. However, McCain seems to have ended his faustian pact with the religious whack-jobs, and I find myself drawn more and more to him as I realise the full extent of the Coyote morning I have got myself into with Rom Paul.Verc, nice try but Dr Ron's denial of evolution coupled with his remarks about how he thinks The Creator should have done things (see the link) does not make me think he has made the leaps in the articles you link to.wcw, I am curious, how is Ron Paul racist? The US constitution I always thought of as a very universalist document, and as far as I can see a lot of his more controversial positions are based on an (entertainingly whacko) fundamentalist reading of that.